Good planning is not NIMBYism

Published August 7, 2026 Albany Times Union

https://eedition.timesunion.com/infinity/article_popover_share.aspx?guid=753b48a0-cb81-4cc5-8541-0bf0ed233b70&share=true

The recent letter regarding Bethlehem's proposed zoning changes highlights how important it is that we continue this conversation with respect for one another and a willingness to understand differing viewpoints. Unfortunately, it focused on a single comment from the original article while overlooking the broader concerns expressed by the majority of residents throughout this discussion. The debate over the proposed zoning law is far more nuanced than simply being for or against affordable housing. Many residents support creating additional housing opportunities, including affordable housing. The real question is how to accomplish that goal in a way that is consistent with sound planning and the capacity of our existing infrastructure.

Bethlehem needs a variety of housing options. We need homes for young families who want to move here because of our schools. We need housing that allows seniors to downsize while remaining in the community, freeing larger homes for the next generation. We also need additional multifamily housing. Many residents simply believe the proposed zoning changes concentrate the greatest density in areas already burdened by heavy traffic, limited road capacity, and little walkability, while other undeveloped areas in the town may be better suited for higher-density growth and have the infrastructure necessary in place.

In many of the fastest-growing communities across the country, local governments anticipate growth by investing in roads, utilities, sidewalks, and other infrastructure before encouraging higher-density development. That kind of planning gives developers confidence to invest while ensuring that growth enhances, rather than overwhelms, a community. Suggesting that the zoning in one district should be reconsidered—or that other areas may be better suited for greater density—is not a “Not In My Backyard” attitude. It is a reasonable planning question that deserves thoughtful consideration.

The zoning law deserves thoughtful discussion without assigning motives to those who raise legitimate questions. We all share an interest in ensuring Bethlehem remains a welcoming, vibrant community. We'll make far more progress and end up with a better product by discussing ideas on their merits, respecting differing perspectives, and working together on practical solutions than by questioning the motives of our neighbors.